theEucharist

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

The Pope is human, so?

Posted on 10:56 AM by Unknown


I have been reading the translation of the meeting with Latin American religious on Rorate Caeli, Rocco Palmo reports the same thing and seems a little more shocked than Rorate.

So, the Pope puts his foot in his mouth from time to time, is it bit too spontaneous, sometimes says foolish things, suggests people don't get too anxious about a letter from the CDF, he's a bit disparaging about a campaign to get people to say the Rosary for him, he talks about "gay lobbies" in the Vatican and old nun's with money.

Yes, it is bit of bad form that he might say publicly that many people want him to sack his MC, Mgr Guido Marini, yes it is a bit humiliating for Monsignor, and a bit damaging for him professionally but we all say things about people that we regret. Yes, one wonders really whether the correction to "the Carnival is over" was correct or whether the original words were correct; "the Carnival is over", in a moment of confusion and tension, sounds in keeping with a less than guarded tongue.

But so? In a way it is all very Petrine, Peter put his foot in his mouth, so much so that Our Lord calls him "Satan". Paul too rebukes him for both his words and actions with the "Judaisers". Peter seems have been a bit garrulous and at times foolish, so why not Pope Francis?

I think we have to remember that Christ Vicar on Earth is a human being, not a committee. As a human being he has frailties and failings, it is part of the beauty of the Incarnation, it is what the Church is about.

On more important occassions, like the daily homilies. at least the Pope's words are "filtered" so we don't get "raw" Pope. That isn't too bad an idea, presumably the Pope reviews the redactions befor they appear on the Vatican website.

The Pope's words and image are being managed and refined, take for example the cameraman who has quietly appeared on the back of the Popemobile to capture a bit of baby kissing, that is part of the modern world.

So?



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The Nuncii
    I was chatting to a couple of Irish friends yesterday, both rather spontaneously said in the words of the second, "Charlie Brown: he...
  • SSPX's Problems
    Recently the SSPX Bishop Tissier de Mallerais revealed during a conference a letter written by Benedict XVI which says an agreement between ...
  • Come to judge the quick and the dedde
    One of the problems of being an aging and solitary celibate is not having a wife or superior to nag you about visiting the doctor; I wasn...
  • Thoughts on the new Prefect of the CDF
    One of my parishioners a nice young single mum was discreetly picking up cigarette ends in the street. She is addicted, she can't afford...
  • More on Müller
    Following on from a post yesterday of the new CDF Prefect, there was an interview on Vatican Radi o with Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller. ...
  • Lello Scorzelli's Ferula: a return to the past
    Broken, tortured, twisted, contorted are the words that come to mind looking at this crucifix. It has the sense of  being in flux, half-form...
  • Norah Out!
    Apparently Ma Popehater can't understand  why Clifton diocese's favourite theologian Professor Norah Batty - head of Cleggy studies ...
  • Orbis Volvitur
    Crux stat dum orbis volvitur The Cross stands still the Earth revolves In monastic life a great deal revolved around the Exaltation of the H...
  • Vocations: thoughts
    I am a bit anxious about our parish's liturgical future, we are loosing our Master of Ceremonies, he believes God is calling him to the ...
  • "Vatican II: A discussion that can no longer be stopped"
    Under the heading, "Vatican II: A discussion that can no longer be stopped".  The excellent Rorate Caeli says: Whatever might be s...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (206)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ▼  June (32)
      • Liturgical Nymphs
      • "United in our differences: this is the way of Jes...
      • Clodovis Boff on Liberation Theology
      • Enculturalisation?
      • The Usus Antiquior and the New Evangelisation: Tra...
      • Michael Vorris Announces a Roman Scandal
      • Getting Cardinal Heenan Right
      • Abstracts of Sacra Liturgia for Day 2
      • Emergency Meeting of Curia Cardinals
      • Sacra Liturgia Conference: Opening Address
      • Fr Gabriel's Oboe
      • Congratulations
      • Bishops: Pastors not Princes
      • The Empty Throne: A Renaissance Mystery
      • John and Thomas: Radical Traditionalists
      • Change?
      • I want to be Emancipated
      • Brighton Greens are Pro-Rat!
      • 'Papa Chicacchierone'
      • Douce dame Joulie
      • "Gay Lobby"
      • The Pope is human, so?
      • An exchange of letters
      • Pope Emeritus' health; fresh concerns
      • Good News for the Venerable English College
      • Adulterous Clerics
      • Francis and Benedict and the Liturgy
      • A Shove to the Right
      • Why shouldn't Dr Who be a woman?
      • Thus people are disposed of, as if they were trash...
      • St Charles Lwanga Pray for us
      • Venice Biennale
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2012 (294)
    • ►  December (43)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (30)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile