theEucharist

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Vin on Marriage Redefinition

Posted on 4:23 AM by Unknown
Archbishop Nichols criticised George Osbourne last night in speech and spoke of the deep unease he felt existed over the redefinition of marriage. He pressed for the full disclosure of the Governments "consultation"
.
But speaking in London, after a four-day meeting of Catholic bishops, the Archbishop said: “He is the politician not I – I just think it is too important to be made simply as a political football.
“This is not simply a redefining of marriage to accommodate a few, it is a redefining of marriage for everyone and therefore all marriages, if this bill is introduced, will be different.
“It is a different reality for everybody and that is a very serious matter and one to which we are very strongly opposed and will remain strongly opposed. He said that while it was for politicians to try to judge the political mood the Church would continue to argue for the traditional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
“It is a very important building block in society and it is very foolish to alter that when as far as we can see there is not a specific identified problem that that change is supposed to be addressing,” he said. “My own sense is that many people feel deeply uneasy about this move, it was not in any election manifesto, it has not in that sense been put to the country.
“That is why the strength of opinion expressed in the consultation ought not to be hidden and that’s why we want the full disclosure of the results of that consultation.”
 At its gathering in Leeds this week, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference agreed a resolution insisting that all political parties allow their MPs a free vote on the issue and the results of the Government’s consultation on “equal marriage” be published in full. The consultation document made clear earlier this year that the different views expressed would be taken into account but “not the number of responses received”.
Perhaps pressing for the disclosure of the consultation document is something that even the most militant pro gay marriage MP is something might agree to, if that happens then perhaps those who are just afraid of being called "bigot" or "homophobe" might take courage.

Perhaps.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 'Heirarchy' of truths
    A load of old nonsense is talked about the idea of "'heirarchy' of truths" by many who do not really understand Catholici...
  • A Jesuit Pope and the Two Standards
    "I will destroy the Church." "But the clergy have been doing that for the last two thousand years, and still they haven't...
  • Missing from the Synod: a Sign of Hope
    We have heard from the Archbishop of Canterbury, the President of the American Bible Society, the Patriach of Constantinople at the Synod on...
  • Processional Thoughts
    Holy Week begins, and ends, with a procession. Processions were very much more significant in the pre-concillior Rites than they are in the ...
  • Shard
    Compare and contrast
  • Change?
    One of those light bulb jokes going the rounds a few years ago: "How many Oratorians does it take to change a light bulb?" Had sev...
  • Moscow Partriarch visits Beijing
    The Patriarch of Moscow has just made an official visit to Beijing and was received by President, Xi Jinping. Metropolitan Hilarion of Volo...
  • SSPX's Problems
    Recently the SSPX Bishop Tissier de Mallerais revealed during a conference a letter written by Benedict XVI which says an agreement between ...
  • Falda Dependency
    The Orthodox would see a bishop con-celebrating Mass with his clergy as a sign that the bishop can do nothing without his his clergy, and th...
  • Dystopia and the destruction of language
    I watched the film of Ray Bradbury's 1953 "Fahrenheit 451" a classic from 1966, in it firemen rather than putting out fires, s...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (206)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ▼  2012 (294)
    • ►  December (43)
    • ▼  November (38)
      • Online Advent Retreat
      • Was Incarnate of the Virgin Mary
      • Loss of the Supernatural
      • Faith and Reason
      • From my Old Parish
      • A Few Observations on a speech by the Tablet's Rom...
      • A Preference for Roman Vestments
      • Two Kingdoms Stand Face to Face
      • Rotherham Fiasco
      • Difficulties with "Catholic" and "Priest"
      • Her Majesty's Ministry for Religion
      • Modern Ultramontanism: a Jesuit Problem
      • Women bishops?
      • Never call her Mother
      • Dancing or Drilling are they the same.
      • Vin on Marriage Redefinition
      • Is it possible to start any reform of the liturgy?
      • The New Ultramontanes
      • Archbishop Mennini urges our Bishops to action
      • Starting Mass
      • More Muck at SMUC
      • Healing: For Victims of Sexual Abuse
      • More on Ed Stourton's Support of Dissidents
      • Catholic Medical Quarterly
      • The Mass Unlocks
      • Chickens Coming Home to Roost
      • Justin Welby: "careful and prayerful" thinking
      • Father Likes It
      • A New Vision
      • Freedom
      • Theology is for Fishermen and Barbers, and the Une...
      • BBC Promotes the Tablet: Statistics
      • Ocean to Ocean: Icon in England Today
      • Bigot of the Year Award
      • Difficulties with Prayer'
      • Tina Calls Bishops to Dissent
      • Dyptichs of the Living and the Dead
      • Book Burning, Clerical Bloggers!
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (30)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile